Trust Rank, fact or fiction?

I think that using "trustrank" will just confuse matters. Drop that termnology and the discussion will go a lot further.
I think that using "trustrank" will just confuse matters. Drop that termnology and the discussion will go a lot further.
You might not realize this, but that is sort of cryptic. Could you elaborate on what you mean? Is there a different terminology that I should use, or is trust rank a bad word of sorts? Sorry if I seem overly uninformed, but that's why I'm asking....
TrustRank has been used by different professionals in different contexts to refer to entirely different algorthmic features.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrustRank

What most people mean when they talk about "trustrank" is actually outbound link weight.

Pages that link to bad neighborhoods lose outbound link weight.

Is that what you were referring to?
The algorithm that begins with something like 200 seed sites that are hand selected as "quality" and "trusted" sites. The so called "Trust Rank" trickles down by following the links from the seed sites and isn't based on link relevance or page rank. Is that outbound link weight?
I have read the original paper done about Trustrankhttp://www.vldb.org/conf/2004/RS15P3.PDF (Yahoo! related) a while back just after Google registered the Trademark. But the spam fighting algo of Trustrank would not be practical for use by Google imo. Perhaps if it is tweaked up a bit more, but I cannot see it as described in the paper as being applied at the moment.
what's ironic is that trustrank's emphasis on old sites as seed sites with lots of TR has resulted in a new opportunity for spammers. What can I say? Google sucks

(阅读次数:


分享收藏到:  新浪ViVi 365Key网摘 Google书签 Windows Live Yahoo书签 添加到百度搜藏
上一篇:Yahoo! Panama PPC Launching Early in U.S. Feb. 5th   下一篇:SEO contests suck.
[本文源自互联网,版权归原作者,转摘为学习参考使用]

评论内容:(不能超过250字,需审核后才会公布,请自觉遵守互联网相关政策法规。
匿名评论
 
数据挖掘论坛导航
资讯点击排行帮
相关资讯
数据挖掘论坛资讯

关于我们  - 网站地图 - 联系方式 - 版权申明 - 友情链接 - 使用帮助
数据挖掘研究院(www.dmresearch.net)
增值电信业务经营许可证编号:皖B2-20040042 文网文:[2005]027号